|
The Positive Thinking Theory Authored By Gary Jones The power of
positive thinking is one of the most popular of the self-help fixes to cure
bad attitudes and wandering motivations, and it is offered in many abundant
forms in today’s market. Since the
first humans desired something that they did not have, such as the infamous
bite of the forbidden fruit, positive thinking has been in existence. The concept of wanting the un-experienced
pleasures is the motivation behind the derivation of erroneous theory of “positive
thinking,” which is closely coupling with its antithesis, the avoidance of
the unpleasant, or lethargy. This
desire and avoidance combination is the essence of our innate
discontentment. It is the same thing
when we try to ignore the unpleasant by thinking of something we consider
pleasant. We humans naturally want to
maximize pleasure and minimize pain.
The admission of this natural tendency finds its origin in recorded
philosophy back in the early third century and called Neoplatonism. This system of philosophy and religion is
composed of elements of Platonism, Aristotelianism,
and oriental mysticism. The teaching
was that there existed an ineffable and transcendent One, from which emanates
the rest of the universe, and because of the natural connection humans have
with this mystical “One,” a state of perfection and happiness is
possible. In addition, this
theory claims evil does not exist in reality, it is likened to darkness; evil
is only the absence of the light.
Positive thinking is a development out of this Neoplatonism
in the secular world promoted by such people as Dale Carnegie in business
applications, Carl Gustav Jung in psychoanalysis, and William James in
philosophy. This system more recently
began mixing with Christianity in the preaching and literature coming from
various religious leaders like Mary Baker Eddy, Norman Vincent Peale, Fulton
J. Sheen, Rick Warren, and Joel Osteen. Perception and Reality The positive thinking theory rests on the assumption
that the mind is the source of reality and all thought represents a product
of this reality. “I think therefore I
am,” a phrase coined by René Descartes. This is the Cartesian philosophy going back
to Socrates and has dominated western thought ever since, which claims that a
man-centered universe bounds reality.
This theory accommodates a relative perception of everything. Any absolute concept is not consistent with
positive thinking because someone else might disagree, and any disagreement
infringes upon the other party’s reality, which has an equal “right” to
exist. It is maintained in this theory
that all religions are worthy of merit.
Above all, it is the “thought” that matters as it is expressed by the
personal spirit, which is not defined.
Through this thought process, humankind can evolve into a perfect and
enlighten being when everyone agrees. In the words of
Ralph Waldo Emerson: "We will walk on our own feet; we will work with
our own hands; we will speak our own minds...A nation of men will for the
first time exist, because each believes himself inspired by the Divine Soul
which also inspires all men." From the
perception of a positive thinker, religious differences are unimportant
because the interpretation of the doctrine is relative to a personal belief
and every individual is drawing from the same transcendental and mystical
origin. Individual perception plays a
major role in religious thought, according to these theorists. Often the positive thinker approaches
controversies with the attitude that the difference of opinion is just
another “disputable matter” created by a different but permissible
interpretation. Peace between all
parties becomes the primary objective.
In the age of future enlightenment, all will see that these differences
really do not matter, according to this line of reasoning. Embedded in the positive thinking philosophy is the notion that this
pure essence is felt in the ability to perceive, sometimes known as God,
guides human lives, but never controls anyone. This god figure is far off somewhere and is
watching us humans progressively grow towards our rightful, peaceful, and
happy purpose as we become aware of our power of personal choice. The idea behind this positive thinking is the claim that the power of
God is inherently inside of each individual and it is releasable by merely
taking control of the thought process and choosing the “right”
alternative. This individual mind
control is sometimes called “faith,” which makes each individual into “little
gods.” This kind of “faith,” explicitly
or implicitly, advocates that, “With man all things are possible.” This is the subscription to the humanistic
psychological belief that the human potential is infinite. Darkness and Light There are warning signs that can tell us about the errors found in the
positive thinking theology. On
identification, these errors become as obvious as the difference between
darkness and light. Looking for the
use of specific phrases is one way of identification, such as an emphasis on
personal pronouns like, “I,” “you,” “my,” and “we.” These pronouns can couple with verbs like,
“want,” “need,” “can,” and “will.”
When these pronouns are combining with these verbs, the listener
should beware! When there are any
references to “self-control” or “tapping your inner power,” “my rights,” “my
responsibility” alarm bells should ring loudly. A subtler indicator of this false teaching
is found in the promotion of some search for your “life’s purpose” or finding
“your gift.” These types of appeal tactics are popular ways to manipulate and gain
control of the listener’s attention and obviate the truth. The most difficult danger signal to detect,
and the most dangerous, is relating to the exploitation of the Scriptures by
these false teachers. The teacher
nearly always misrepresents the Scriptures, the quoted passage, the context,
or some combination, in a way to make a point about justifying
self-determination. These are
generally very cleverly constructed premises that are difficult to notice
without a careful study of the passage.
Two of the most amazing observable things about these false teachers
are their adroit skill in making a sales presentation and their demonstrated
ignorance of the Scriptures. Wants and Needs These two
qualifiers, wants and needs, are frequently easy to confuse and difficult to
define. In such a quandary, we are
open to influences coming from our desires and the appeal of the
smooth-talking salespersons. Any good
salesperson will capitalize on our confusion and try to convince us that our
“wants” are really our “needs.” Once this
question is answered to our satisfaction then a “signing agreement” is
forthcoming. The positive thinking
minister uses this tactic of defining the implied need to manipulate the
listeners. The offered advantage
proposed by the minister, who is selling positive thinking, is an opportunity
to gain wealth and happiness, and these benefits they call God’s
blessings. They also make
the implied argument that you will lose God’s intended blessing if we fail in
a satisfactory acceptance of the offer.
In the presentation, typically the phrase, “God wants you to be
blessed” implies an inducement and, directly or indirectly, indicating that
the listener has the responsibility to take some necessary action before God
will grants His blessing. We need to heed
the scriptural warnings about being seduced by any of the pervasive clever
salesperson’s presentations and “Get Help” authors who offer any shot-cut
method in finding God’s peace. We must
remember who is in control, see the “God is Sovereign,” article on this web
page. The Bible says, “3For the time will come
when men will not put up with sound doctrine.
Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a
great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. 4They will turn their ears away from
the truth and turn aside to myths” [2 Timothy 4:3, 4]. |